{"id":24822,"date":"2015-06-03T17:42:37","date_gmt":"2015-06-03T14:42:37","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/erdallaw.com\/?p=24822"},"modified":"2017-02-27T18:26:48","modified_gmt":"2017-02-27T16:26:48","slug":"turk-hukukunda-manevi-tazminatin-mirascilara-intikali-mumkun-mudur","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.erdallaw.com\/en\/turk-hukukunda-manevi-tazminatin-mirascilara-intikali-mumkun-mudur\/","title":{"rendered":"T\u00fcrk Hukukunda Manevi Tazminat\u0131n Miras\u00e7\u0131lara \u0130ntikali M\u00fcmk\u00fcn M\u00fcd\u00fcr?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]04.10.1926 tarihinde 743 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun olarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren, T\u00fcrk Kanunu Medenisi (EMK) 75 y\u0131l y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte kalm\u0131\u015f ve 01.01.2002 tarihinde yerini, 4721 say\u0131l\u0131 T\u00fcrk Medeni Kanunu (TMK)\u2019na b\u0131rakm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. \u015eu an y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte olan TMK bir \u00e7ok alanda de\u011fi\u015fiklikler getirmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckten kald\u0131r\u0131lan, EMK\u2019ya 3444 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun ile ilave edilen 24\/a maddesinin hukukumuza getirdi\u011fi bir yenilik de manevi tazminat talebinin miras\u00e7\u0131lara intikal edebilmesiydi. Ki\u015filik hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinden do\u011fan manevi tazminat talep hakk\u0131n\u0131 ki\u015finin sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc \u015fahsa devri, bu talebin kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u00e7a kabul\u00fc \u015fart\u0131na ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015f iken, miras\u00e7\u0131lara intikali i\u00e7in herhangi bir \u015fart \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclmemi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>Di\u011fer taraftan, EMK 85. maddesinde ni\u015fan\u0131n bozulmas\u0131ndan do\u011fan manevi tazminat talebinin kural olarak miras\u00e7\u0131lara intikal etmeyece\u011fi; ancak miras a\u00e7\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 zaman iddia kabul edilmi\u015f veya dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ise miras\u00e7\u0131lara intikal edece\u011fi h\u00fckme ba\u011flanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Manevi tazminat talep hakk\u0131n\u0131n miras\u00e7\u0131lara intikali bu hakk\u0131n \u015fahsa s\u0131k\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131ya ba\u011fl\u0131 niteli\u011fine ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi EMK 85. maddesiyle de \u00e7eli\u015fmekteydi.<\/p>\n<p>TMK\u2019n\u0131n 25. maddesi;<\/p>\n<p>\u201cDavac\u0131, hakimden sald\u0131r\u0131 tehlikesinin \u00f6nlenmesini, s\u00fcrmekte olan sald\u0131r\u0131ya son verilmesini, sona ermi\u015f olsa bile etkileri devam eden sald\u0131r\u0131n\u0131n hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n tespitini isteyebilir.<br \/>\nDavac\u0131 bunlarla birlikte, d\u00fczeltmenin veya karar\u0131n \u00fc\u00e7\u00fcnc\u00fc ki\u015filere bildirilmesi ya da yay\u0131mlanmas\u0131 isteminde de bulunabilir.<br \/>\nDavac\u0131n\u0131n, maddi ve manevi tazminat istemleri ile hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131 dolay\u0131s\u0131yla elde edilmi\u015f olan kazanc\u0131n vekaletsiz i\u015f g\u00f6rme h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine g\u00f6re kendisine verilmesine ili\u015fkin istemde bulunma hakk\u0131 sakl\u0131d\u0131r.<br \/>\nManevi tazminat istemi, kar\u015f\u0131 taraf\u00e7a kabul edilmi\u015f olmad\u0131k\u00e7a devredilemez; miras b\u0131rakan taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olmad\u0131k\u00e7a miras\u00e7\u0131lara ge\u00e7mez.<br \/>\nDavac\u0131, ki\u015filik haklar\u0131n\u0131n korunmas\u0131 i\u00e7in kendi yerle\u015fim yeri veya daval\u0131n\u0131n yerle\u015fim yeri mahkemesinde dava a\u00e7abilir.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>h\u00fckm\u00fcne amirdir. Kanun koyucu bu madde ile yukar\u0131da a\u00e7\u0131klanan durumu d\u00fczeltmi\u015f ve ki\u015filik hakk\u0131n\u0131n ihlalinden do\u011fan manevi tazminat talebinin miras b\u0131rakan taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olmad\u0131k\u00e7a miras\u00e7\u0131lara ge\u00e7emeyece\u011fi h\u00fckm\u00fcne yer vermi\u015ftir. Bunun kar\u015f\u0131 kan\u0131t\u0131ndan manevi tazminat talebinin ancak miras b\u0131rakan taraf\u0131ndan ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131 durumunda miras\u00e7\u0131lara ge\u00e7ebilece\u011fi kabul edilmi\u015ftir.<\/p>\n<p>\u00d6te yandan ni\u015fan\u0131n bozulmas\u0131ndan do\u011fan manevi tazminat talebinin intikaliyle ilgili yukar\u0131da tart\u0131\u015f\u0131lan h\u00fck\u00fcm de kanundan \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. TMK\u2019n\u0131n 121. maddesi \u015fu anda;<\/p>\n<p>\u201cNi\u015fan\u0131n bozulmas\u0131 y\u00fcz\u00fcnden ki\u015filik hakk\u0131 sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011frayan taraf, kusurlu olan di\u011fer taraftan manev\u00ee tazminat olarak uygun miktarda bir para \u00f6denmesini isteyebilir.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>h\u00fckm\u00fcn\u00fc i\u00e7ermektedir. Bunun sonucu olarak, s\u00f6z konusu talebin miras\u00e7\u0131lara intikali de TMK\u2019n\u0131n 25. maddesindeki \u015farta uygun olarak ger\u00e7ekle\u015febilecektir. \u00d6nceki d\u00fczenlemeden farkl\u0131 olan di\u011fer bir husus da manevi tazminat talebinin intikali i\u00e7in dava yoluyla ileri s\u00fcr\u00fclm\u00fc\u015f olmas\u0131n\u0131n zorunlu olmamas\u0131, sald\u0131r\u0131ya u\u011frayan ki\u015finin talebini ortaya koyan ve kan\u0131tlanabilen \u00f6zg\u00fcr iradesinin yeterli olmas\u0131d\u0131r.[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row][vc_column][vc_column_text]04.10.1926 tarihinde 743 say\u0131l\u0131 kanun olarak y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe giren, T\u00fcrk Kanunu Medenisi (EMK) 75 y\u0131l y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fckte kalm\u0131\u015f ve 01.01.2002 tarihinde yerini,&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[115],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.erdallaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24822"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.erdallaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.erdallaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.erdallaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.erdallaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=24822"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.erdallaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24822\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":24823,"href":"http:\/\/www.erdallaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/24822\/revisions\/24823"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.erdallaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=24822"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.erdallaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=24822"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.erdallaw.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=24822"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}